Feeds:
Posts
Comments

I just received an email from a friend of mine. You won’t believe it!

IF YOU READ THIS , I AM SURE YOU WILL SEND IT ON!!!!!!

Subject: FW: Jane FondaDate: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 16:54:59 -0600

For those of you too young to remember  Hanoi Jane is a bad person and did some terrible things during the Vietnam  war.  Things that can not be forgiven!!!!

For  those who served and/or died.  NEVER  FORGIVE A TRAITOR.

SHE REALLY WAS A  TRAITOR!! and now OBAMA wants to honor  her……!!!!

In  Memory of LT. C.Thomsen Wieland  who  spent 100 days at the Hanoi Hilton.

She  really is a traitor.

IF YOU NEVER  FORWARDED ANYTHING IN YOUR LIFE FORWARD  THIS SO THAT EVERYONE WILL KNOW!!!!!!

A TRAITOR IS ABOUT TO BE HONORED. KEEP THIS MOVING  ACROSS AMERICA.

This is for all the  kids born in the 70’s and after who do not remember, and didn’t have to bear the burden  that our fathers, mothers and older brothers and  sisters had to bear..Jane  Fonda is being honored as one of  the ‘100 Women of the Century.’

BARBRA WALTERS  WRITES:    Unfortunately,  many have forgotten and still countless others  have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only  the idea of our country, but specific men who  served and sacrificed during Vietnam.

The first part of this is from an F-4E  pilot. The pilot’s name is Jerry Driscoll,  a River Rat.  In 1968, the former Commandant  of the USAF  Survival School was a POW in Ho Lo  Prison the ‘ Hanoi Hilton.’

Dragged  from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed,  and dressed in clean PJ’s, he was ordered to  describe for a visiting American ‘Peace Activist’ the ‘lenient and humane treatment’  he’d received.

He spat at Ms. Fonda,  was clubbed, and was dragged away.  During  the subsequent beating, he fell forward on to  the camp Commandant ‘s feet, which sent that  officer berserk.

In 1978, the Air Force  Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the  Commandant’s frenzied application of a wooden  baton.

From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan  was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E’s). He spent 6 years in  the ‘Hanoi Hilton’,,, the first three of which  his family only knew he was ‘missing in action’.  His wife lived on faith that he was still alive.

His group, too, got the cleaned-up, fed  and clothed routine in preparation for a ‘peace  delegation’ visit. They, however, had  time and devised a plan to get word to the world that they were alive and still survived.

Each  man secreted a tiny piece ofpaper, with his  Social Security Number on it , in the palm of  his hand. When paraded before Ms. Fonda  and a cameraman, she walked the line, shaking  each man’s hand and asking little encouraging  snippets like:’Aren’t you sorry you bombed  babies?’ and ‘Are you grateful for the humane  treatment from your benevolent captors?’

Believing this HAD to be an act, they each  palmed her their sliver of paper.She  took them all without missing a beat.. At the  end of the line and once the camera stopped  rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the POWs, she turned to the officer in charge and handed  him all the little pieces of paper.

Three men died from the subsequent  beatings. Colonel Carrigan was almost number  four but he survived, which is the only reason  we know of her actions that day.

I was a  civilian economic development advisor in Vietnam, and was captured by the North Vietnamese  communists in South  Vietnam in 1968, and held prisoner for  over 5 years.

I spent 27 months in  solitary confinement; one year in a cage in  Cambodia and one year in a ‘black box’ in  Hanoi. My North Vietnamese captors deliberately  poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a nurse in a leprosarium in Ban me Thuot , South  Vietnam , whom I buried in the jungle near the  Cambodian border.

At one time, I weighed only  about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs.) We were Jane Fonda’s ‘war criminals’.

When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi, I was  asked by the camp communist political officer if  I would be willing to meet with her..I  said yes, for I wanted to tell her about the  real treatment we POWs received… and how  different it was from the treatment purported by the North Vietnamese, and parroted by her as  ‘humane and lenient.’ Because of this, I  spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees,  with my arms outstretched with a large steel  weights placed on my hands, and beaten with a  bamboo cane.

I had the opportunity to  meet with Jane  Fonda soon after I was released.  I asked  her if she would be willing to debate me on  TV. She never did answer me. These  first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone  who should be honored as part of ‘100 Years  of Great Women.’

Lest we forget….’ 100 Years  of Great Women’ should never include a traitor  whose hands are covered with the blood of so  many patriots. There are few things I  have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane’s participation in blatant treason, is one  of them.

Please take the time to forward to as  many people as you possibly can.

It will eventually end up on her computer and she  needs to know that we will never forget.

PLEASE HELP BY SENDING  THIS TO EVERYONE IN YOUR ADDRESS BOOK. IF ENOUGH PEOPLE SEE THIS MAYBE HER STATUS WILL  CHANGE.

RONALD  D. SAMPSON, CMSgt, USAF 716 Maintenance  Squadron,Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431  COMM: 883-6343

Jeff CadieuxJLC Associates Inc.3198 A Airport Loop Dr . Costa Mesa , Ca 92626 tel:  714-241-4430 fax: 714-241-4433visit our web site at www.JLCASSOC.com

President Obama will make history as the first sitting president on a daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of “The View.” But he’ll be missing out on another historic occasion — the Boy Scouts’ Jamboree marking the group’s 100th ,  anniversary right in the president’s backyard.

The Jamboree kicked off this week at Fort A.P. Hill in Virginia, where organizers had invited the president to speak to the 45,000 scouts in attendance. All three of Obama’s predecessors have made it to one Jamboree while in office.

Read more->

By Simon Heffer – Telegraph UK – March 08, 2010

It is a universal political truth that administrations do not begin to fragment when things are going well: it only happens when they go badly, and those who think they know better begin to attack those who manifestly do not. The descent of Barack Obama’s regime, characterized now by factionalism in the Democratic Party and talk of his being set to emulate Jimmy Carter as a one-term president, has been swift and precipitate. It was just 16 months ago that weeping men and women celebrated his victory over John McCain in the American presidential election. If they weep now, a year and six weeks into his rule, it is for different reasons.

The once mighty Detroit seems to be on the verge of being abandoned.

Despite the efforts of some sections of opinion to talk the place up, America is mired in unhappiness, all the worse for the height from which Obamania has fallen. The economy remains troublesome. There is growth – a good last quarter suggested an annual rate of as high as six per cent, but that figure is probably not reliable – and the latest unemployment figures, last Friday, showed a leveling off. Yet 15 million Americans, or 9.7 per cent of the workforce, have no job. Many millions more are reduced to working part-time. Whole areas of the country, notably in the north and on the eastern seaboard, are industrial wastelands. The once mighty motor city of Detroit appears slowly to be being abandoned, becoming a Jurassic Park of the mid-20th century; unemployment among black people in Mr. Obama’s own city of Chicago is estimated at between 20 and 25 per cent. One senior black politician – a Democrat and a supporter of the President – told me of the wrath in his community that a black president appeared to be unable to solve the economic problem among his own people. Cities in the east such as Newark and Baltimore now have drug-dealing as their principal commercial activity: The Wire is only just fictional.

Last Thursday the House of Representatives passed a jobs Bill, costing $15 billion, which would give tax breaks to firms hiring new staff and, through state sponsorship of construction projects, create thousands of jobs too. The Senate is trying to approve a Bill that would provide a further $150 billion of tax incentives to employers. Yet there is a sense of desperation in the Administration, a sense that nothing can be as efficacious at the moment as a sticking plaster. Edward B Montgomery, deputy labor secretary in the Clinton administration, now spends his time on day trips to decaying towns that used to have a car industry, not so much advising them on how to do something else as facilitating those communities’ access to federal funds. For a land without a welfare state, America starts to do an effective impersonation of a country with one. This massive state spending gives rise to accusations by Republicans, and people too angry even to be Republicans, that America is now controlled by “Leftists” and being turned into a socialist state.

“Obama’s big problem,” a senior Democrat said, “is that four times as many people watch Fox News as watch CNN.” The Fox network is a remarkable cultural phenomenon which almost shocks those of us from a country where a technical rule of impartiality is applied in the broadcast media. With little rest, it pours out rage 24 hours a day: its message is of the construction of the socialist state, the hijacking of America by “progressives” who now dominate institutions, the indoctrination of children, the undermining of religion and the expropriation of public money for these nefarious projects. The public loves it, and it is manifestly stirring up political activism against Mr. Obama, and also against those in the Republican Party who are not deemed conservatives. However, it is arguable whether the now-reorganizing Right is half as effective in its assault on the President as some of Mr. Obama’s own party are.

Mr. Obama benefited in his campaign from an idiotic level of idolatry, in which most of the media participated with an astonishing suspension of cynicism. The sound of the squealing of brakes is now audible all over the American press; but the attack is being directed not at the leader himself, but at those around him. There was much unconditional love a year or so ago of Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama’s Chief of Staff; oleaginous profiles of this Chicago political hack, a veteran of that unlovely team that polluted the Clinton White House, appeared in otherwise respectable journals, praising the combination of his religious devotion, his family-man image, his ruthless operating technique and his command of the vocabulary of profanity. Now, supporters of the President are blaming Mr Emanuel for the failure of the Obama project, not least for his inability to construct a deal on health care.

This went down badly with friends of Mr Emanuel, notably with Mr. Emanuel himself. His partisans, apparently taking dictation from him, have filled newspaper columns and blogs with uplifting accounts of the Wonder of Rahm: as one of them put it, “Emanuel is the only person preventing Obama from becoming Jimmy Carter”. They attack other Obama “sycophants”, such as David Axelrod, his campaign guru, and Valerie Jarret, a long-time friend of Mrs. Obama and a fixer from the office of Mayor Daley of Chicago who now manages – or tries to manage – the President’s image. These “sycophants” have, they argue, tried to keep the President above politics, letting Congress run away with the agenda, and gainsaying Mr. Emanuel’s advice to Mr. Obama to get tough with his internal opponents. This naive act of manipulation has brought its own counter-counterattack, with an anti-Emanuel pundit drawing a comparison with the UK’s own Prime Minister and ridiculing the idea that Mr. Obama should start bullying people too.

The root of the problem seems to be the management of expectations. The magnificent campaign created the notion that Mr. Obama could walk on water. Oddly enough, he can’t. That was more Mr. Axelrod’s fault than Mr. Emanuel’s. And, to be fair to Mr. Emanuel, any advice he has been giving the President to impose his will on Congress is probably well founded. The $783 billion stimulus package of a year ago was used to further the re-election prospects of many congressmen, not to do good for the country. America’s politics remain corrupt, populated by nonentities whose main concern once elected is to stay elected; it seems to be the same the whole world over. Even this self-interested use of the stimulus package appears to have failed, however. Every day, it seems, another Democrat congressman announces that he will not be fighting the mid-term elections scheduled for November 2. The health care Bill, apparently so humane in intent, is being “scrubbed” (to use the terminology of one Republican) by its opponents, to the joy of millions of middle Americans who see it as a means to waste more public money and entrench socialism. For the moment, this is a country vibrant with anger.

A thrashing of the Democrats in the mid-terms would not necessarily be the beginning of the end for Mr. Obama: Bill Clinton was re-elected two years after the Republicans swept the House and the Senate in November 1994. But Mr. Clinton was an operator in a way Mr. Obama patently is not. His lack of experience, his dependence on rhetoric rather than action, his disconnection from the lives of many millions of Americans all handicap him heavily. It is not about whose advice he is taking: it is about him grasping what is wrong with America, and finding the will to put it right. That wasted first year, however, is another boulder hanging from his neck: what is wrong needs time to put right. The country’s multi-trillion dollar debt is barely being addressed; and a country engaged in costly foreign wars has a President who seems obsessed with anything but foreign policy – as a disregarded Britain is beginning to realize.

There are lessons from the stumbling of Mr. Obama for our own country as we approach a general election. Vacuous promises of change are hostages to fortune if they cannot be delivered upon to improve the living conditions of a people. The slickness of campaigning that comes from a combination of heavy funding and public relations expertise does not inevitably translate into an ability to govern. There is no point in a nation’s having the audacity of hope unless it also has the sophistication and the will to turn it into action. As things stand, Barack Obama and America under his leadership do not.

If this Passes – There will be war.

On Wednesday, March 31st, 2010, Obama took the first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States.

The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for U.S. citizens with the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama can use the U.S. State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.

Once the U.S.Government signs the international treaties, all U.S. citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These laws have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Micheal Bloomber. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms of American citizens.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment rights before our citizenry understands what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation – in the United States – that will lead to new gun control laws,  cloaked in secrecy,  while our Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, is committing the U.S. to international treaties and foreign gun control laws.

Does that mean that Obama is telling the truth – while his minions are doing the damage?

What this means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates – whether in the media or votes in the Congress.

We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearms and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public.

We will wake up on another morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership.

And then, we will wake up again and find that the United States has signed a treaty that requires U.S. citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning.

As sure as government health care will be forced down our throats by the Obama administration thorough whatever means, so will gun control.

A news article from Reuters stated:

“The United States reversed policy on Wednesday (March 31, 2010) and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

“The decision, announced in a statement released by the U. S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush’s administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better than allowing foreign countries to dictate our gun control policies”.

The 2nd Amendment clearly states:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”.