Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘CDC’

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Agriculture Department would be given the power to regulate all food sold in schools — including vending machine snacks — when Congress renews child nutrition programs, the chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee said on Tuesday.

Chairman Tom Harkin said he hopes the committee will start work on legislation to reauthorize school lunch programs in October or November, with a goal to conclude the work by the end of the year.

“I can tell you it won’t be this month,” Harkin told reporters who asked when work would begin. He said precedence must go, for now, to his work on health care reform and on drafting the annual federal spending bills.

Agriculture Committee work on child nutrition will begin with a draft that gives the USDA the authority to oversee all food in schools, so nutrition programs are not “undermined” by junk food in vending machines, Harkin said at a confirmation hearing for the head of the USDA’s nutrition programs.

Earlier this year, Harkin co-sponsored a bill focused on setting nutritional standards for food in school vending machines and stores to combat childhood obesity rates.

Kevin Concannon, the Obama administration’s nominee to run USDA’s food and nutrition programs, told Harkin he wants to work with other federal and state agencies to address health issues caused by poor eating habits.

“It’s a cultural thing. We’ve evolved to this over the past 30 or 40 years, and it’s going to take efforts on a number of fronts,” Concannon said.

Roughly 17 percent of school-age children are obese, triple the rate in 1980 and “an epidemic in the United States,” says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Obesity increases the risk of diabetes, heart disease, arthritis and other chronic illnesses.

At present, USDA oversees the contents of school lunches and bars the sale of foods with minimal nutritional value, such as soda in the lunchroom. It does not control food sold in a la carte lines or school stores.

Concannon, who ran food stamp and public nutrition programs in Iowa, Maine and Oregon during his career, noted he has seen “pushback” from schools that count on revenue from vending machines to pay for student activities.

Concannon also said he wants people who rely on USDA food programs to be able to buy more food from farmers’ markets.

Food stamps, school lunch programs, and other nutritional assistance account for more than $75 billion, or two-thirds of USDA’s annual spending.

One in nine Americans uses food stamps to buy groceries, a record number due to recession and job losses, and more than 30 million children count on USDA-funded school programs for lunch.

The Obama administration, which has a goal of eliminating childhood hunger by 2015, proposed a $1 billion a year increase in child nutrition programs but has provided few details of how it would spend the money.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Or check into your local hospital?

On a cruise to Bermuda in 2007, Baltimore resident Wilhelmina Watnoski was surprised to find that passengers were required to clean their hands when entering and leaving the ship’s eatery. ” There was actually a person standing there making you do it,” Watnoski recalls. Her reaction? A note of thanks to the ship’s management.

Watnoski is all too aware of the destruction a tiny, unseen germ can wreak. Two of the most dagergous and most common bugs that stalk U.S. health care facilities infected her 80-year old father in late 2004 after he was hospitalized for a urinary tract infection. Sent to a rehabilitation facility to regain his strength, Walter Wiatr instead developed uncontrollable diarrhea and lost his appetite. That, Watnoski learned, was thanks to an organism called Clostridium difficile (C.diff). She moved hime to another facility. But soon a painful red swelling appeared on his neck, the sign of another infection – this time it was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, a bacterium that’s spread by person-to-person contact and is resistant to common antibiotics. Two months after his intial hospitalization, Wiatr, who’d been independent and healthy, was gone.  “He went down hill so fast, I still can’t believe it happened like that,” his daughter says.

American hospitals are treating sicker patients with more complex, invasive techniques – and helping people live longer. But every year in these same facilities some 90,000 Americans pick up infections that kill them.

Hard to treat superbugs are an increasing problem as widespread use of antibiotics produces new germs that are drug-resistant and few new medications are in the pipeline.  In the 1970’s only a tiny percentage of hospital staph infections were MRSA.  By 2004 MRSA accounted for two out of three staph infections, usually attacking patients with weakened immune systems or those using catheters, intravenous lines or ventilatiors.

Clostridium difficile also is a rising threat. Few Americans had heard of this intestinal bug until November, 2008, when a study showed its prevalence is as much as 20 times higher than previous estimates. Sponsored by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemilogy (APIC), the study looked at C. diff cases in nearly 650 U.S. health care facilities on a single day between May and August 2008. Findings suggest that on an average day, nearly 7,200 hospitalized patients – 13 out of every 1,000 – are colonized or, more often, infected with C.diff, and about 300 patients will not survive it. The young and older patients are especially vulnerable. Infection often follows the use of antibiotics, which strip the gut of certain bacteria, allowing C. diff to proliferate there.

Because the chief symptom is profuse diarrhea, the bug is easily spread everywhere – onto hands, bed rails, sheets, IV poles. “The primary mode of transmission,” says William Jarvis, M.D., lead author of the prevaleance study, “is person-to-person transmission on the hands of health care workers or contaminated equipment.”

Research has shown that health care workers clean their hands effectively only about half the time, and the hardiness of C.diff spores adds a twist to the challenges they face. At one time the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) routinely recommended cleaning the hands with alcohol based rubs. But alcohol won’t kill C.diff – it takes a scrubbing with soap and warm water to eliminate the spores. Similarly, only bleach will kill spores on surfaces; but the APIC study found that even in an outbreak, about a third of institutions don’t ever clean with bleach.

These facts underline the urgent need for all health facilities to adopt the best practices to stop the spread of germs – sanitizing rooms and equipment; washing hands thoroughly; inserting catheters in sterile conditions; monitoring for dangerous organisims; and taking special precautions with patients who carry them.

The proliferation of superbugs is a daunting problem, but one that has the attention of consumer advocates, insurers, federal and state governments, as well as hospitals and health care providers.

How do we beat the Superbugs?  Follow the money.

Hospital=acquired infections cost and estimated $20billion a year, according to the CDC, and a lot of human suffering. For example, the knee replacement Margaret Day, of Fort Lauderdale, FL., had in 2006 would have been a great success – except for the C.diff infection that kept her in the hospital 20 days, some spent semiconcious in the ICU. This ordeal was not only costly for Medicare and the hospital, it also cost Day, an active 88-year-old, thousands of dollars a month in medicine and for help at home for her recovery.

On Oct. 1, 2008, Medicare stopped paying for complications arising from certain infections (but not C.diff) and conditions that result from hospital care and are “reasonably preventable.” The government wants hospitals to make safety measures job one, says Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and patient safety policy at the American Hospital Association. “Hospitals have heard that,” she says, and are adopting new strategies to protect patients. Some private insurers, including CIGNA, WellPoint and United Healthcare, are following Medicare’s lead on not paying for medical errors in hospitals.

Consumer advocates say that public scrutiny can prod health facilities into action. “Hospitals begin to be more aware and evaluate their processes as soon as the state passes a law that says they’re going to have to report infection rates to the public,’ says Lisa McGiffert, head of Consumers Union’s campaign against hospital infections.

To date, 25 states have done just that. The quality of data may vary from state to state and even facility ro facility, but the first reports show that some hospitals are safer than others.

For years, hospitals have accepted certain kinds of infection as inevitable. One example: About 250,000 Americans a year get a bloodstream infection after having a catheter inserted into a large vein to give fluids or medications. Such infections have had a death rate as high as one in four.  But last month, a CDC study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), indicated that preventive measures had helped lower the rate of MRSA bloodstream infections by 50% from 1997 to 2007, based on reports from 1,684 ICUs.  Of course, this only is true of those who reported their percentages to the study.

Certain hospitals are ahead of the game. With help form the CDC, 32 hospitals in southwestern Pennsylvania adopted a rigourous protocol and slashed the rate of bloodstream infections in their UCSs by 68% from 2001 to 2005. And 108 hospitals in Michigan in 2003 embarked on a voluntary program that virtually wiped out bloodstream infections.

In March 2008 the U.S. Government Accoutability Office (GAO) reported that the government recommeds 1,200 seperate practices to prevent infection in hospitals, 500 of which are “strongly recommened.”

In October a consortium of leading health care professional societies, the American Hospital Association and the Joint Commission, an agency that accredits hospitals, published a document boiling down the government verbiage into six strategies targeting major problems.

The Michigan program used an even simpler method to protect patients from infection. Doctors and nurses were required to follow a five-step checklist – washing hands, wearing sterile gowns and gloves, and protecting the patients with antiseptics and sterile drapes and dressings – developed by a Johns Hopkins University team of safety experts led by Peter Pronovost, M.D.

After 18 months, according to the December 2006 JAMA, the median rate of bloodstream infections in the Michigan ICUs had plunged to zero, saving an estimated 1,500 lives.

Experts say that controlling the spread of superbugs isn’t rocket science. Indeed, Pronovost has said that precisely because the stakes are high and the problems complex, the to-do list must be “ruthlessly simple.” That way there’s no excuse for not following these lifesaving measures.

Now Pronovost’s approach is being tested in England, Ireland, Spain and in many U.S. hospitals. It’s already keeping patients safe in the 77 bed Gerber Memorial Hospital in Fremont, MI, where doctors and nurses convene each day to plan care for ICU patients. Stephanie Gustman, R.N., the unit’s clinical coordinator, says, “We want to make sure we’re doing everything that’s proven best for that patient.”

To learn more:

Consumers Union offers information on states requiring hospitals to report infection rates. Go here and click on “State Hospital Infection Disclosure Laws.”

The Leapfrog Group‘s website provides ratings of 1,300 hospitals and information on infection prevention measures.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicade Services, reports quality information on hospitals.

The Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths.

The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Click on “Patient Guides.”

Thanks to Katharine Greider for this article  – as sophomoric as it was.

Read Full Post »

(NYT) – There’s no question that the case of 9-year-old Hannah Poling of Athens, Ga., has fueled the controversy about childhood vaccines. But what’s less clear is whether it will help unlock the mysteries of autism.

Hannah was 19 months old and developing normally until 2000, when she received five shots against nine infectious diseases. She became sick and later was given a diagnosis of autism.

Late last year government lawyers agreed to compensate the Poling family on the theory that vaccines may have aggravated an underlying disorder affecting her mitochondria, the energy centers of cells. (To read more about the decision, click here.) Vaccine critics say the Hannah Poling settlement shows the government has finally conceded that vaccines cause autism. But government officials say Hannah’s case involved a rare medical condition, and there is still no evidence of a link between vaccines and autism.

Hannah’s father, Dr. Jon S. Poling, a practicing neurologist in Athens and clinical assistant professor at the Medical College of Georgia, says the case has shifted the autism debate forever and points to a promising new area of research.

Writing in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Friday, Dr. Poling says there is compelling evidence that mitochondrial disorders, like the one his daughter has, are strongly associated with autism.

To understand Hannah’s case, it is important to understand mitochondria, which act like batteries in our cells to produce energy critical for normal function…. Emerging evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction may not be rare at all among children with autism. In the only population-based study of its kind, Portuguese researchers confirmed that at least 7.2 percent, and perhaps as many as 20 percent, of autistic children exhibit mitochondrial dysfunction. While we do not yet know a precise U.S. rate, 7.2 percent to 20 percent of children does not qualify as “rare.” In fact, mitochondrial dysfunction may be the most common medical condition associated with autism.

Dr. Poling urges the Institute of Medicine and public health officials to pursue research into mitochondrial conditions, which he describes as a “breakthrough in the science of autism.’’ He writes:

National public health leaders, including those at CDC, must now recognize the paradigm shift caused by this biological marker with regard to their current position of dispelling a vaccine-autism link. In light of the Hannah Poling concession, science must determine more precisely how large the mitochondrial autism subpopulation is: 1 percent, 7.2 percent, 20 percent?

To be sure, many health experts do not agree with Dr. Poling’s conclusions. The case has “added nothing to the discussions of what causes or doesn’t cause autism,” said Dr. Edwin Trevathan, director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

On Friday, many of the main players involved in this debate — including Hannah’s mother and her grandparents, prominent vaccine skeptics and some of the government’s top vaccine researchers — took part in the federal government’s first-ever public meeting to discuss a government-wide research agenda to explore the safety of vaccines.

To read Dr. Poling’s complete essay, click here. Last month, Dr. Paul A. Offit, chief of the infectious diseases division of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, explained his view that the Hannah Poling case has been mischaracterized by vaccine critics. To read the piece, click here. Hannah Poling’s parents wrote this response to Dr. Offit’s report. Last month, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution wrote this profile of Hannah and her parents.

It isn’t the vaccines that are causing the problem, it’s how and when the vaccines are given. Isn’t this so?

Read Full Post »